Archive

Posts Tagged ‘networks’
lbrown

Draft Strategies for Advertising Technology and Fantasy Football – Choose Wisely

August 30th, 2010
FFL and Digital Media

FFL and Digital Media

Anyone know what time of year it is?  That’s right, it’s fantasy football draft season.  If you’ve played before, you know that draft season is the most stressful time of year.  This is when you have to sit down, look at all the players that are available and decide which ones will help you win a fantasy football championship.  There are many strategies that you can deploy, and the most conventional is to draft running backs- fast, furious and early on.  Why?  They are the steady players that give you consistent point production.  But, fantasy football has changed.  Some NFL teams now use multiple running backs (AKA running back by committee).  Other teams have moved away from running the ball all together and have opted for the exciting air attack.  This opened up opportunities for fantasy owners to structure their teams around additional point contributors like a Quarter Back like Drew Brees or a Wide Receiver like Larry Fitzgerald.  Decisions, decisions. 

How does fantasy football relate back to digital media? 

Well, it’s also technology budgeting season.  Today’s publishers and specialty ad networks feel the stress of making technology decisions for 2011.  They have to sit down, review all the projects they are going to push for and make a stake in the ground that “these are the initiatives that will put us in the best position to win”.  

Many of these projects will fall into 2 categories.  The first category is revenue.  Plain and simple, if that project is successful, it will directly help you make money.  There should be no ambiguity.  Some example projects include:

  • Developing custom creative programs to help you attract new brands
  • Building a mobile, video or  social media ad server that promotes engagement metrics or gives you a competitive advantage in the market place
  • Introducing rich media tools

The second category is around helping companies drive efficiency inside and outside their organization.  Below are some examples of efficiency-focused initiatives:

In order to be successful in 2011, media companies need to do both.  You MUST do both.  If you don’t innovate, you won’t attract the big ad dollars.  If you only innovate and forget about the back-end efficiency, you’ll lose all the customers you won or have a ceiling on the amount of customers you can take-on due to inefficiency.  Quite the predicament. 

For most media companies, there are the few factors contributing to this problem:

  1. You’ve got 1 engineering team and they are drinking through a fire hose.  I don’t care who you are…if you’re a digital media owner in some capacity, your engineering team has too much on their plate and not enough time.  Furthermore, with all the new technology in the market place, it’s just getting worse and worse.
  2. Most publishers, even today, still run their business on excel.  There’s not one platform in place that you can use as a springboard for innovation.  Not one place to connect all these new things that you’re buying or creating.  This is also the reason your operations teams are so busy.  They have to log into 10 different systems to get their jobs done. No wonder there is so much demand for projects that create efficiency.
  3. A large percentage of the technology and business leadership within media organizations still promotes a “let’s build it all” type of mentality.  For example, the industry hasn’t matured enough where the role of the CIO is relevant – there’s no one to advise the CEO on best practices on how to get information, drive revenue and scale (all at the same time).

If this sounds familiar and your ability to be successful depends on your engineering team executing, consider some of these ideas:

  1. Make a list of all the projects you have on your plate for 2011.  From there, put a “$” next to each one that your sure will help you drive revenue next year.  Then, put an “E” next to the ones that will help your bottom line (efficiency gains, speed to market, etc.).  Getting clarity on what these projects actually “mean” for the business is the first step.  
  2. From there, make the decision to partner with a company that can offer an enterprise platform to help you run your day to day business and gain those efficiencies (inventory management, proposals, packaging, trafficking, reporting, financial reconciliation, etc.).  Make sure your partner has an API and SDK to help you innovate.  You’ll find there are companies that can not only help you get deal with a lot of your “E”s, but also enable you to innovate the “$”s.
  3. It’s important to ensure that the company’s technology culture has a strategic focus on revenue and strategic value creation.  I ran into one publisher recently who calls his engineering team “Team Money”.  That’s because their engineering leadership has a mentality of selecting projects that will help the company drive new revenue by establishing partnerships with companies that help them achieve greater efficiency.   This is a cultural change and isn’t always easy.  Engage your CEO in this concept – make it a big deal towards hitting the 2011 revenue number.

By focusing your engineering teams on things that are exciting (like drafting quarterbacks and wide receivers) and partnering with a company that can help you innovate and scale (your work horse running back), you’ll be in a better position to be successful in 2011…successful in beating your competition, meeting the new demands of brand advertisers, raising employee satisfaction in your engineering department and keeping both the top and bottom line on the up and up.

mquillinan

Download the Operative White Paper: State of the Industry- Digital Operations

June 25th, 2010

Operative Survey: The State of the Industry- Digital Operations

For the last 2 weeks, we’ve been working with the team at DM2PRO to survey the digital advertising community about the current state of affairs:

- Growing need for data integration among all players in the ecosystem

- Blurring lines between publisher, agency, brand and network roles and responsibilities

- As we continue to innovate, our inability to adopt those innovations is holding us back!

- Fragmentation is NOT going away….and agencies, publishers, brands, advertisers and networks alike need to stop losing money and bring our systems together to compete effectively. Read more…

jdressler

IAB Annual Leadership Meeting 2010- Brand Sales vs. Ad Networks

February 23rd, 2010

A publisher has to decide:

1. All in- is it brand advertising? or

2. Are they optimizing for networks? 

A media company is based on the content and the sales force.  It is practically impossible to have a hybrid strategy and not lose value for your brand.  Most companies work with zero partners or more than 5 partners. 

86% of network impressions are brought in from the top 100 publishers.  This has a direct devaluation of publisher content.  If you are going to sell premium inventory, you have to know that your premium product won’t have the same value off your site.  Premium sites need large units, high reach, integrated advertising products.  There are a couple of ways to get reach: optimization, Tweeting, social media, possibly M&A, or aggregation.

In 2010, 25% of dollars will come from ad networks.  If publishers move to optimizing for ad networks, the trend will be to reduce of most of the premium sales force.

For more information, please click here.

Author: Categories: Uncategorized
jdressler

IAB Annual Leadership Meeting: Investments Bankers view on the Online Advertising Industry

February 22nd, 2010

Tolman Geffs
Co-President
The Jordan, Edmiston Group, Inc.

In the last 2 years, there has been a major drop in acquisitions in the online advertising industry, but we are starting to see a rebound in activity and value.   Brand advertising has taken a huge hit, while direct and promotional advertising have spiked.  This does not mean brand advertising is dead. 

Display advertising demand was always sold on a site by site basis.  Now, selling audience is even more important.  This is a trend that Tolman expects will explode.   Audience targeting will grow a lot faster than typical web site display ads.   Both agency and demand side platforms are changing the way media is being purchased.   As we move forward, you have ad delivery servers vs publishers vs audience targeting sellers.   The winner will change how the online advertising space transforms. 

Premium publishers are losing a key advantage: premium content and premium audience.  What’s happening today is that premium audiences can be built much easier through a network.   The question is, can publishers provide more value to the advertiser and the audience to win back a majority of the margin?

Online video is getting funded at higher multiples than only 18 months ago.   Online video should be growing at a faster rate than most of the online advertising market.   TV budgets are shifting, and being used for both TV and streaming advertising units. 

 Mobile advertising has a good chance, but currently, mobile advertising is geared more towards promotions and direct marketing efforts, as opposed to brand advertising.  

Local online advertising is also experiencing a lot of activity in both mergers and funding.    

So what are the implications of M&A?  

Interactive activity will be robust in the next 18 months.  Innovation is happening faster, ad revenue continues to grow at a nice rate (8%) and there’s a lack of an IPO window.  Strategic buyers will be the busiest people with record cash- they need high growth business.  But, it is not just about big companies.  Private equity will play a major role in the coming years.  With an economic turnaround, we are looking for more activity with strategic buyers in the marketplace.